Alemania
Indecision Time
Jesse Simon
Of the many genres in which Beethoven
worked, opera seems to have given him the greatest difficulties. It is not that
he lacked the capacity for musical drama – as most of his purely instrumental
works attest – but rather that his sense of drama as something continuous,
intense and unstoppable didn’t quite fit with the elaborate plots, closed forms
and spoken dialogue considered the norm of German-language operatic expression
at the beginning of the nineteenth century. Although Fidelio, in its final form, would go on to secure its place in the
standard repertoire, it remains a work fascinating more for its uncontainable spirit
than its willingness to play by the rules.
Some of its structural imbalance can be
attributed to the opera’s complex genesis: it began as the three-act Leonore, and the first act, with its
minor characters and romantic subplots, can seem insubstantial when set against
the highly-focussed narrative of struggle-and-redemption that defines Act Two.
The new production of Fidelio at the
Deutsche Oper – directed by David Hermann and conducted by Sir Donald Runnicles
– decided to tackle the problems of form and balance by blasting through the
opera as quickly as possible. The spoken dialogue was reduced to only a few
lines – and omitted entirely between some numbers – and the music was pushed
forward at a frantic pace. The result was a production that felt uneasy less
for the implied violence of the libretto (or the real violence of the staging)
than for a hurried pace that left little room for reflection.
Mr Hermann’s staging was set in a space
that suggested a prison in outline, even if the prisoners, all wearing
oversized papier-mâché face masks, pushed it into the realm of the unreal. It
nonetheless evoked a mood of gloom and despair: the curtain rose on Marzelline
and Jaquino scrubbing down a dead body (which was later pushed into the large,
seemingly bottomless pit at the centre of the stage), and even the nominally
friendly encounters between Fidelio and Rocco contained a barely supressed
violence that one felt could erupt at any moment. It was a promising starting
point: even if the characters never quite settled into plausibility – Pizarro
was little more than a cartoon villain and the staging couldn’t seem to decide
if Rocco should be sinister or benevolent – the opening scenes established
a convincing unease.
That mood continued into the first part of the
second act, set in the large cavernous space at the bottom of the pit. Then, in
the finale, Mr Hermann attempted a sudden left turn that destroyed the
credibility of the staging in a single stroke. There were, admittedly, a few
intriguing ideas: the notion that Florestan, half-starved and imprisoned in
total darkness, might have turned somewhat feral was a reasonable alternative
to the usual narrative of noble suffering; and the fact that he might be more
angry than grateful towards Don Fernando – who could, after all, have been a
bit more active in finding out what happened to his ‘friend’ – had a certain
logic. But in its final quarter-hour, the staging couldn’t decide if it wanted
to pivot to a happy ending or pursue its own dark mood (a direction that the
music simply would not support). Rather than choosing a direction, the staging
ended up breaking from the strain of its own indecision.
The lack of firm tone and clear direction
was compounded by the arrival of the choir as a group of moderately well-dressed
spectators held back from the main action by a cordon; they clearly belonged to
a different narrative universe than the rest of the staging, and while they
were obviously there to make some kind of conceptual point, no one involved in
the production seemed to know what to do with them. Their actions in the final
chorus – breaking through the cordon in an attempt to apprehend the characters,
doing a kind of slow-motion jazz-handy dance, then freezing entirely, giving
the characters a chance to escape their clutches – weren’t merely incoherent,
they were silly … and they had the effect of devaluing everything that had come
before.
One must assume that the sudden rupture of
the conclusion was intentional. Mr Hermann has, in the past, knowingly ‘ruined’
the tone of his own stagings in the service of some larger argument (his
Dresden Ariadne, in which the climactic duet was destroyed by the
arrival on stage of a group of bourgeois dinner guests taking selfies with the
singers, offered an instructive comparison, although that at least had some
basis in the opera’s frame narrative). Here, however, it did not seem as though
Mr Hermann was wilfully subverting the staging, so much as fumbling it. Not
only did it render the final scene deeply unsatisfactory, but it forced one, in
the final moments, to reconsider the quality of the staging as a whole: had the
uncertainty of tone in the first act been intentional, or was it simply
careless handling of the scenario.
The difficulties of the staging were
compounded by an oddly perfunctory approach to the music. Although Sir Donald
Runnicles found a good balance between the alternatingly relaxed and driven
passages of the overture, he had a tendency to press many of the first act
scenes forward at uncomfortably brisk speeds. Rocco’s ‘Gold’ aria needed more
space to establish its paternal feeling, ‘Komm, Hoffnung’ sped by with only a
passing glance at its emotional complexity, and the first act finale offered
little chance for the male choir to savour their moment of freedom; only the
first act quartet was given the luxury of building naturally to its peak. The
driven pace was perhaps better-suited to the dramatic focus of the second act –
the quartet, especially, found a good middle ground between vocal ensemble and
forward momentum – but one was too often left with the sense of a breathless
dash through the score.
As Leonore, Ingela Brimberg gave the
evening its dominant voice. If the pace of ‘Komm, Hoffnung’ didn’t allow her
quite enough space for the cultivation of nuance, she was nonetheless able to
summon convincing emotional turmoil. But she was at her best in the ensembles,
in which she was invariably the commanding presence: she established a subtle
preeminence in the first act trio with her strident voice cutting against the
relative complacence of Rocco and Marzelline, but was most compelling as the
driving force behind the dramatic second act quartet. In terms of stage
charisma, Ms Brimberg’s only equal was the Rocco of Albert Pesendorfer, who
managed to remain likeable despite the staging’s vaguely sinister vision of the
character. Although forced to rush through the ‘Gold’ aria, his rapid-fire
dialogue with Fidelio in the first act finale and the gloomy tension of the
grave-digging scene possessed some of the evening’s rare moments of character
drama.
Despite a physically compelling
performance, Robert Watson spent much of Florestan’s monologue struggling
against the weight of the orchestra; while there were a handful of nicely
phrased moments, the scene never quite took flight. Jordan Shanahan, a late
replacement for Markus Brück, approached the role of Pizarro with plenty of
energy and villainous flourishes, but his voice seemed an odd match for the
role and the character never emerged as a genuine threat. However Thomas Lehman
used his brief appearance to sketch the outline of an intriguingly ambiguous Fernando;
Gideon Poppe, while suffering the fate of all Jaquinos – effectively written
out of the plot midway through the first act – nonetheless made a notable
contribution to the first act quartet; and Sua Jo, after freeing herself from
Jaquino’s pawing in the opening duet, delivered Marzelline’s lone aria with
pleasingly understated grace. In the few moments when the singers, orchestra
and staging came together, one was reminded of Fidelio’s potential for
greatness; but on this evening such instances were too brief (and too spread-out)
to offset the prevailing unevenness.
Comentarios