Alemania
Coming to Rest
Jesse Simon
…and in the end, it all made sense. For the most part.
The first two instalments of Stefan Herheim’s new Ring cycle for the
Deutsche Oper – Das Rheingold, which opened this past June, and Die
Walküre which opened a year ago – were ingenious pieces of theatrical
invention, delightful as standalone works of drama, yet brimming with images
and ideas that seemed to pull its central concept in any number of directions
at once; while watching the ideas accumulate during those first two evenings,
one was often left wondering where Mr Herheim was going to go with them and how
he might resolve them all within the framework of the operatic text he was
duty-bound to follow. Although we still have to wait until next month for the
belated première of Siegfried, Mr Herheim’s Götterdämmerung – which
opened the new season at the Deutsche Oper – brought his cycle to an immensely
satisfying conclusion.
The final part of Mr Herheim’s Ring confirmed
what the first parts had suggested: his production was not merely a reimagining
of the story so much as an attempt at a comprehensive critical overview of
everything that Wagner’s cycle has meant to different audiences over the
century and a half since its first performances. Although directed with a light
touch and filled with moments that seemed casual or irreverent, it remained
keenly aware of the Ring’s complex legacy and the impossible
expectations of its audience. It was, in short, about the baggage that this
ever-popular and ever-controversial work has accumulated over the years –
represented quite literally in its sets constructed of suitcases – and, by
extension, the myriad dangers that any director will face in attempting to
impose their own vision upon it. It is a staging which might have had Wieland Wagner,
Patrice Chéreau or Götz Friedrich nodding in sympathy.
The first two parts of the cycle were concerned with
the notion of the operatic text as an inviolable object, and the character of
Wotan was presented as a director whose will to creative power is continually
frustrated by the deterministic force of the score. The bound volumes
containing music and text, which appeared so prominently in Rheingold
and Walküre, were replaced in Götterdämmerung by an equally
intransigent force: the audience. The scenes in Gibich’s hall were set in an
onstage replica of the foyer of the Deutsche Oper – complete with giant cloud
sculpture – and many of the characters seemed not only aware that there was an
audience sitting out there in the darkness, but at certain points revealed
themselves to be terrified of their silent judgement.
The stroke of genius in Mr Herheim’s staging was in
realising that, after the defeat and retirement of Wotan in the third act of Siegfried,
it is Hagen who essentially takes over in the role of director: as Wotan does
in Walküre, Hagen lays out the guidelines and positions the characters
within a scene, then watches and hopes that the action will unfold according to
his design. Yet by passing the directorial duties to Hagen, Mr Herheim was not
transferring the central role from one character to another so much as
stripping away the godly veneer from the figure of the director, revealing him
to be both human and fallible. It is Hagen’s impatience and his lust for power
– the unattainable power over a canonical text to which some directors aspire –
that proves to be the ultimate cause of his madness and downfall; his final
line before storming out was delivered as an admonition not to the Rhinemaidens
nor even the audience, but to anyone rash enough to believe that they can scale
the heights of Wagner’s masterpiece with their own ideas intact.
The subtle irony in the staging is that its real
director was able to achieve what the surrogate onstage director could not: if
Wotan and Hagen were ultimately overwhelmed by the task of staging the Ring, Mr
Herheim suffered no such crises; his vision of the story was focussed and
confident, and the big ideas that underpinned the cycle remained subordinate to
the pleasures of a well-told story. If anything, Götterdämmerung was
less busy than its predecessors. The silent chorus of onlookers, who had played
such a crucial role in the earlier operas, were absent from much of the first
act, allowing the central characters to emerge in sharply rendered detail. If
the evening was less reliant on stage magic and sleights of hand, Mr Herheim
was still able to summon images of appropriate grandeur as well as seemingly
simple ideas that challenged conventional readings of the text: the council-of-the-gods
tableau elevated Waltraute’s visit to Brünnhilde from pure character drama into
a visual high-point of the first act, and his treatment of the Rhinemaiden
scene made remarkable sense of their sudden change in tone when Siegfried
summons them back.
Musically the evening was generally strong although
not without its peculiarities. Perhaps the main point of contention was Hagen.
As the effective centre of Mr Herheim’s staging – more so even than Brünnhilde
– Gidon Saks delivered a physical performance of unquestioned brilliance, that
moved in a finely graded arc from excitable in the first act, to manic in the
second, to completely unhinged in the third. Vocally, however, he seemed an odd
fit for the part. Although his summoning of the vassals in the second act was
spirited, there were far more moments when he seemed too light of tone or too
wayward in his phrasing. It is difficult to say how much his line-readings were
the result of Mr Herheim’s intervention, but it often seemed that his
dedication to realising the physical demands of the role came at the expense of
carefully considered vocal line.
As in Walküre, Nina Stemme delivered a selfless
Brünnhilde, confident enough to cede the stage to Siegfried or Waltraute, yet
powerful and graceful enough to command the rapt attention of the audience in
crucial scenes. It was a performance that gathered steadily in strength as the
evening progressed; in the Prologue she sounded almost reticent – and, in a few
passages, at odds with the orchestra – and in the Waltraute scene one
occasionally became aware of the role’s taxing technical demands. By the second
act, however, she was on thrilling form, wresting control of the stage from
Hagen in the wedding scene confrontation; and her gripping performance of the
final scene came remarkably close to flawless.
As Siegfried, Clay Hilley gave the impression of being
completely untroubled by the role’s demands. Although he proved himself capable
of full-bodied room-filling notes, his performance was notable for its
restraint, and his refusal to claim the full attention of the audience with his
every utterance resulted in a nicely balanced first act. As with Ms Stemme, Mr
Hilley’s performance seemed to grow more powerful as the evening progressed,
and by the time of his excellent scene with the Rhinemaidens, one was sorry
that his time on stage was drawing to an end.
The appearance of Waltraute, although brief, is a
crucial turning point in the drama – it is the moment at which the end becomes
inevitable – and Okka von der Damerau delivered a magnificent performance,
infusing the scene with majesty and dread. Other smaller roles were also well
cast: while the staging presented Gunther as meekly subservient to Hagen,
Thomas Lehman had enough authority to convey the complexity of his shame and
grief in the second and third acts; and Aile Asszonyi’s Gutrune, although
slightly cold at first, warmed up with the arrival of Siegfried and was at her
most affecting in the third act waiting anxiously for the hunting party’s
return. Jürgen Linn delivered Alberich’s messages to Hagen with clarity and energy,
and the trio of Rhinemaidens – two of whom doubled as Norns – were
consistently charming.
The ability of Sir Donald Runnicles to maintain
evenly-paced drama while keeping the work’s mythic grandeur at the fore was
apparent throughout the evening. There were a few surprises: the chorus of the
vassals seemed unusually brisk, although the slight loss of vocal clarity was
more than offset by a surplus of enthusiasm; and the extreme shifts in tempo between
Alberich’s rapid-fire recaps and Hagen’s somnolent replies at the beginning of
the second act gave the scene a pleasingly off-kiltre energy. Much of the
evening, however, proceeded without drawing undue attention to itself,
supporting and accentuating the action without overwhelming it.
The Ring is described as a ‘cycle’ in part because its
four segments form a single iteration of a story that is destined to repeat
itself indefinitely; it is a story that begins from nothing and, in the end,
returns to the same nothingness from which it emerged. Between those two
bookends of nothing there is everything, a universe of ideas and emotions, lofty
mythologies and messy human dramas; in the opening scene of Mr Herheim’s Rheingold,
a simple E-flat summoned that universe into being causing Wotan’s troupe of
wanderers to become enveloped in the magic of the story. In the final moments
of Götterdämmerung, Mr Herheim left us with an image so unexpectedly
perfect that we wonder how we didn’t see it coming. It was (without wishing to
give too much away) an image that brought the staging to rest in a definitive
and satisfying manner while reminding us that every end contains the promise of
a new beginning.
Comentarios